Q: What is the most depressing sport for a track and field athlete?
A: The high jump, because even the winner ends by failing to clear the bar.
Recording can be a bit like that. Sometimes you will start off on a high and the track will almost record itself, right through to the finished mix. You’ll stand back in amazement and wonder, “Did I do that?”.
But generally, those days are few. You strive and struggle to make each individual track the best that it can possibly be.
And in the mix you try out just about every combination of fader levels, pans, EQs, compressors and reverbs you can think of.
But although you end up knowing that your work is professional in quality, there is that lurking doubt that it could be just that little bit better, if only you could find the ‘magic’ to make it so.
Taking an optimistic view, this is one of the things that makes recording so endlessly fascinating.
Somehow, you know where the goal is, but you just can’t quite get there.
But why is it difficult? There must be some underlying reason.
One reason why it is difficult is that you are in competition with the best. You hear the work of the top people in the industry every day.
You wouldn’t even bother to dream about being good enough to play in a world-class football team.
But we all, every last one of us reading (and writing!) these words, believes that we have a damn good chance of turning out a piece of work that will wow the entire world.
And, yes, it can happen. It has happened for many artists, producers and engineers who are now world class, but once worked out of a home studio.
Fundamental to success is a solid, thorough knowledge and skill-set in the equipment and techniques involved.
This involves knowing how the equipment does its job, and its relative strengths and weaknesses – for example, this would include knowing the difference between a diode bridge compressor and a variable-mu compressor, and having an appreciation of their relative sound qualities.
And then you need to know how to apply your equipment too music. Like an artist knows how to blend pigments and apply their various paraphernalia.
The good news? Well firstly, the standard of the pros is high, but it’s not unattainable. Keep your mind on the solid fundamentals of audio, the things that DON’T change from moment to moment.
And, even if you don’t make it all the way, recording is just so much FUN. And the more seriously you take it, the more fun you will get out of it.
Don’t forget to let us know when you have your first hit!
“It isn't about equipment and software -
So your band has a website. That is so 2009! Why not get the new decade started with an iPhone app that showcases your talent to the (iPhone) world? Read more...
I feel that I am struggling with electronics. Do I really need to understand this or is it something I can ignore? Read more...
Can your DAW handle 32 tracks? 64? A hundred?? A thousand??? Read more...
Lower latency, better CPU load balancing, reduced memory usage, better disk performance... Something to look forward to? Read more...
'If you don't ask, you don't get!' That's a good old proverb. But have you asked anyone recently? This guy has... Read more...
Every microphone used in pro audio has a diaphragm. Suppose that a new technology could detect sound in a non-invasive way. Surely that would be much more accurate than the mics we now have? Read more...
So you are listening to the latest hit by Katy Perry (we won't tell anyone!). But can you hear which mic she is using? Or anything else about the recording?? Read more...
Pro Tools 10 adds clip-based gain to its feature set. But what does it offer that can't be done with fader automation? (This applies to all other DAWs too.) Read more...
Any pro studio would have both main monitors and nearfields. But now you can have both in one package. Read more...
Having great equipment doesn't always lead to great recordings. And how much will you regret wasting your money? Read more...
So you record using virtual instruments. Can you really call yourself a producer? Read more...
It might be impossible to achieve perfect soundproofing against the sonic onslaught of heavy traffic, but small improvements can be gained quite easily. Read more...
Many people blunder into a new recording without giving tempo more than half a moment's consideration. But setting the right tempo can make or break a track... Read more...
One of the most enduring myths in recording has been the endless quest for more and more tracks, which grew exponentially from the real need to overdub in the 60's. Prior to 4 track, overdubs were made by compiling sounds from one machine to another - with a generation loss of sonics every time... Read more...
I always set up my projects at 24 bits/44.1 kHz, but recently I noticed how sample libraries are offering 32 bits/96 kHz. Do you think we have to use them? Read more...
Take off the grille cloth of your loudspeakers and you will see that they have holes, with tubes extending inside the cabinet. Why? What would happen if you blocked them up? Read more...
You are about to update software that is vital to your business. But you have a backup of your boot disk, so if it goes wrong you think you are safe. Well think again! Read more...
Chopping up beats from pre-existing drum loops has long been a standard part of the production process. But can you be a Beat Slicer for a living? Read more...
Your mic might be cardioid, omnidirectional, figure-of-eight or hypercardioid, but what difference will it make to your recording? Read more...
Or does it? Can clever mic technique and audio processing really improve the sound of an instrument? Read more...
An RP reader finds that a certain combination of microphone and preamp works much better than he expected...
Anyone with a home recording studio now has the means to create a hit. So why haven't you yet?
What sounds good to the electric guitar player doesn't necessarily sound good to the audience. A live sound engineer explains...
So you're setting yourself up in the voice over business. What should you think about before anything else?
Amazingly, the answer to this question is - almost - yes!
If you're miking one of the finest violinists in the world, should you point the mic at the double bass instead?
An RP reader fears losing cabinet resonances if the backline of his band is miked up through the PA. But perhaps it is innovation in live sound that has been lost over the years.
Any theatre would have tielines from the stage to the sound control booth. But from one side of the booth's window to the other?
A major producer has 'stolen' a song from a pair of unknowns. A crime, or normal everyday life in the music business?
AKG makes some of the best mics in the world. AKG also makes a USB mic. A great USB mic?
Two singers, one microphone. Could it cause an Internet sensation?
If a tree falls in the woods, does it make a sound (if no-one is around to hear it?) If you can't hear hum, then is there no hum?
Are you planning on getting your tracks mastered? Then the first rule of preparation is not to master the tracks yourself.
You can get a plug-in to emulate virtually any analog audio process these days. But what about hum? Where's the plug-in for that?
Take a 300-year old bass line, a cello player with just seven days' experience, and some highly uncool-looking musicians... and make a recording that is really top of the pops for weird!
Sometimes unusual microphone placements can capture an interesting sound. In this instance, the sound is completely wrong.
Clicks occur for all kinds of reasons - imprecise editing, random noises, gremlin infestation. But when do you need to do something about them?
There are so many decisions to be made during the process of recording. Should you make them one at a time as you go along, or let them pile up so that you have a mass of decisions to make in the mix?
Audio production - it's all about the DAW isn't it? Well that's what marketers would have you believe.
Content can be art. Art can be content. But when content is just a commodity, there is surely something going wrong.