Since DAT was intended to be a consumer product right from the start, the cassette is very small, roughly three inches by two inches and just under half an inch thick. For professional users, this is rather TOO small, not just because it makes the cassette easier to lose, but because there will always be some doubt that DAT could have been a better system if there had been a bit more elbow room. The problem is not so much that DAT is unreliable, but that it has been found that a tape recorded on one machine will not always play back correctly on another. This is, I would imagine, a problem that will be solved as manufacturing tolerances tighten. Professional users want this problem solved quickly and absolutely, and I imagine that domestic users will too. It has always been a nuisance with the Compact Cassette that a cassette might play perfectly on the machine on which it was recorded, but try and play it on another machine and it will sound dreadful - all due to the alignment of the tape heads. For the home recordist, this is a problem because giving tapes to other people is something you do all the time, and they will not be very impressed if the sound is mangled due to a tiny misadjustment.
Having said that DATs size is a disadvantage for professional users, it really is amazing how it achieves what it does working at microscopic dimensions. As I said earlier, not only does the tape move, the tape heads move too. DATs full title, R-DAT, indicates that the system uses a rotary head like a video recorder. Unlike analogue tape which records the signal along a track parallel to the edge of the tape, a rotary head recorder lays tracks DIAGONALLY across the width of the tape. So even though the tape speed is a miniscule 8.15 millimetres/second, the actual writing speed is a massive 3.133 metres/second. Figure 1 shows the pattern of the tracks recorded across the tape. The width of each track is 13.591 MILLIONTHS of a metre, or to give an imperial measurement comparison, you could fit ??? tracks into just one inch. Unlike an analogue tape, the tracks are recorded without any guard band between them. In fact, the tracks are recorded by heads which are around 50% wider than the final track width and each new track partially overlaps the one before, erasing that section. Since the same heads are used for recording and playback, this may seem to present a problem because if the head is centred on the track it is meant to be reading, then it will also see part of the preceding track and part of the next track. Wont this result in utter confusion? Well it doesnt, of course, because a system originally developed for video recording is used, known as AZIMUTH RECORDING. The azimuth of a tape head refers to the angle between the head gap, where recording takes place, and the tape track itself. In an analogue recorder the azimuth is always adjusted to 90 degrees, so that the head gap is at right angles to the track. In DAT, which uses two heads, one head is set at -20 degrees and the other to +20 degrees, and they lay down tracks alternately. So on playback, each head receives a strong signal from the tracks that it recorded, and the adjacent tracks, which are misaligned by 40 degrees, give such a weak signal that it can be rejected totally. Damn clever.
“It isn't about equipment and software -
This video is a quality comparison between the Samson C03U and Rode NT1-A microphones. Mark, AKA Akumaryu, begins the review by giving some background on his Samson C03U, which he had been using for four years... Read more...
It's not often a genuinely new opportunity comes along, but one is about to very soon. Anyone can have a go at it. Those who succeed will hit the big time. Read more...
Q: "I have been watching the FIFA World Cup on TV (June 2010). I find the sound of the vuvuzela very irritating. Why don't the sound engineers filter it out?" Read more...
A pro recording studio for £135 a day (around $200 USD), with access to just about any exotic gear you could possibly want - could this possibly be true? Read more...
We're organising a mass protest against the Larrikin Music vs. Men At Work court decision. Join now and the kookaburra may not have the last laugh. Read more...
We think we know everything these days. But are we getting a little too clever? Perhaps people in an earlier age of recording knew something that we don't. Read more...
Early mixing consoles had quadrant faders instead of the linear faders of today. Do they just look pleasantly retro, or do they have advantages we have now lost? Read more...
Apple's Final Cut Pro X, at $299, should pull the rug from under Avid's Media Composer's feet. But are they competing in the same pro market? And is FCPX any good anyway? Read more...
An RP reader asks, "I want to know the best filters for mastering. I want to know the best EQ." Read more...
Can an $89 pair of monitors really be an effective tool in the recording studio? Or are they only good for 'media creation? Read more...
It's a topic of endless debate, but really there is no way a stream of digits can beat the real vinyl experience. Read more...
Ask anyone with a real and passionate interest in audio - they got into it young. But as young as this? That's going some! Read more...
Are there a hundred different ways to record the snare drum? The answer is 'Yes!', and you need to understand them all... Read more...
Having great equipment doesn't always lead to great recordings. And how much will you regret wasting your money? Read more...
With many home recording enthusiasts setting their sights on making their productions sound professional, somehow *excitement* seems to be taking a back seat. Wouldn't it be great if your recordings could be both professional AND exciting? Read more...
George Martin, producer of The Beatles, is posher than the Queen of England. So who would have thought he was once a Cockney? Read more...
It's a simple question, but the answer is both simple and complex at the same time. Read more...
This one was written back when I was 21 or so and has been recorded a few times on various media. In this case, the bed tracks were recorded on a friend's mac laptop using i presume garageband in 2003 I think.... Read more...
If you have an iDevice and $4.99 to spare, you can take a weird trip with an extraordinary looping app, the TC-Helicon VoiceJam. Read more...
When you're dead, you're dead. What a fantastic opportunity for people to start rifling though your life! Read more...
Classical music just needs to be recorded, doesn't it? Well in some cases it really can be produced.
Can an $89 pair of monitors really be an effective tool in the recording studio? Or are they only good for 'media creation?
A wrong note that has resonated for more than half a century is fixed - without the aid of a time machine.
An RP reader finds that a certain combination of microphone and preamp works much better than he expected...
Anyone with a home recording studio now has the means to create a hit. So why haven't you yet?
What sounds good to the electric guitar player doesn't necessarily sound good to the audience. A live sound engineer explains...
So you're setting yourself up in the voice over business. What should you think about before anything else?
Amazingly, the answer to this question is - almost - yes!
If you're miking one of the finest violinists in the world, should you point the mic at the double bass instead?
An RP reader fears losing cabinet resonances if the backline of his band is miked up through the PA. But perhaps it is innovation in live sound that has been lost over the years.
Any theatre would have tielines from the stage to the sound control booth. But from one side of the booth's window to the other?
A major producer has 'stolen' a song from a pair of unknowns. A crime, or normal everyday life in the music business?
AKG makes some of the best mics in the world. AKG also makes a USB mic. A great USB mic?
Two singers, one microphone. Could it cause an Internet sensation?
If a tree falls in the woods, does it make a sound (if no-one is around to hear it?) If you can't hear hum, then is there no hum?
Are you planning on getting your tracks mastered? Then the first rule of preparation is not to master the tracks yourself.
You can get a plug-in to emulate virtually any analog audio process these days. But what about hum? Where's the plug-in for that?
Take a 300-year old bass line, a cello player with just seven days' experience, and some highly uncool-looking musicians... and make a recording that is really top of the pops for weird!
Sometimes unusual microphone placements can capture an interesting sound. In this instance, the sound is completely wrong.
Clicks occur for all kinds of reasons - imprecise editing, random noises, gremlin infestation. But when do you need to do something about them?