Digital Audio Tape (DAT) (part 3)
Since DAT was intended to be a consumer product right from the start, the cassette is very small, roughly three inches by two inches and just under half an inch thick. For professional users, this is rather TOO small...
Since DAT was intended to be a consumer product right from the start, the cassette
is very small, roughly three inches by two inches and just under half an inch
thick. For professional users, this is rather TOO small, not just because it
makes the cassette easier to lose, but because there will always be some doubt
that DAT could have been a better system if there had been a bit more elbow
room. The problem is not so much that DAT is unreliable, but that it has been
found that a tape recorded on one machine will not always play back correctly
on another. This is, I would imagine, a problem that will be solved as manufacturing
tolerances tighten. Professional users want this problem solved quickly and
absolutely, and I imagine that domestic users will too. It has always been a
nuisance with the Compact Cassette that a cassette might play perfectly on the
machine on which it was recorded, but try and play it on another machine and
it will sound dreadful - all due to the alignment of the tape heads. For the
home recordist, this is a problem because giving tapes to other people is something
you do all the time, and they will not be very impressed if the sound is mangled
due to a tiny misadjustment.
Having said that DATs size is a disadvantage for professional users,
it really is amazing how it achieves what it does working at microscopic dimensions.
As I said earlier, not only does the tape move, the tape heads move too. DATs
full title, R-DAT, indicates that the system uses a rotary head like a video
recorder. Unlike analogue tape which records the signal along a track parallel
to the edge of the tape, a rotary head recorder lays tracks DIAGONALLY across
the width of the tape. So even though the tape speed is a miniscule 8.15 millimetres/second,
the actual writing speed is a massive 3.133 metres/second. Figure 1 shows the
pattern of the tracks recorded across the tape. The width of each track is 13.591
MILLIONTHS of a metre, or to give an imperial measurement comparison, you could
fit ??? tracks into just one inch. Unlike an analogue tape, the tracks are recorded
without any guard band between them. In fact, the tracks are recorded by heads
which are around 50% wider than the final track width and each new track partially
overlaps the one before, erasing that section. Since the same heads are used
for recording and playback, this may seem to present a problem because if the
head is centred on the track it is meant to be reading, then it will also see
part of the preceding track and part of the next track. Wont this result
in utter confusion? Well it doesnt, of course, because a system originally
developed for video recording is used, known as AZIMUTH RECORDING. The azimuth
of a tape head refers to the angle between the head gap, where recording takes
place, and the tape track itself. In an analogue recorder the azimuth is always
adjusted to 90 degrees, so that the head gap is at right angles to the track.
In DAT, which uses two heads, one head is set at -20 degrees and the other to
+20 degrees, and they lay down tracks alternately. So on playback, each head
receives a strong signal from the tracks that it recorded, and the adjacent
tracks, which are misaligned by 40 degrees, give such a weak signal that it
can be rejected totally. Damn clever.
“It isn't about equipment and software -
it's all about knowing how to use it”
Samson C03U vs. RODE NT1-A
This video is a quality comparison between the Samson C03U and Rode NT1-A microphones. Mark, AKA Akumaryu, begins the review by giving some background on his Samson C03U, which he had been using for four years... Read more...
An amazing new ground-floor opportunity in production!
It's not often a genuinely new opportunity comes along, but one is about to very soon. Anyone can have a go at it. Those who succeed will hit the big time. Read more...
Q: How can I filter out the vuvuzela?
Q: "I have been watching the FIFA World Cup on TV (June 2010). I find the sound of the vuvuzela very irritating. Why don't the sound engineers filter it out?" Read more...
Record in a professional studio for £135 ($200) a day?
A pro recording studio for £135 a day (around $200 USD), with access to just about any exotic gear you could possibly want - could this possibly be true? Read more...
Men At Work copyright case - PROTEST NOW!
We're organising a mass protest against the Larrikin Music vs. Men At Work court decision. Join now and the kookaburra may not have the last laugh. Read more...
Should we clean up old recordings, or keep their noise and distortion in all their glory?
We think we know everything these days. But are we getting a little too clever? Perhaps people in an earlier age of recording knew something that we don't. Read more...
Quadrant faders - will they make a comeback?
Early mixing consoles had quadrant faders instead of the linear faders of today. Do they just look pleasantly retro, or do they have advantages we have now lost? Read more...
Avid's had it, or has it?
Apple's Final Cut Pro X, at $299, should pull the rug from under Avid's Media Composer's feet. But are they competing in the same pro market? And is FCPX any good anyway? Read more...
Q: What are the best filters for mastering?
An RP reader asks, "I want to know the best filters for mastering. I want to know the best EQ." Read more...
M-Audio Studiophile AV 30 monitors - Could they be Auratones for the digital age?
Can an $89 pair of monitors really be an effective tool in the recording studio? Or are they only good for 'media creation? Read more...
It's true! Vinyl IS better than digital!!
It's a topic of endless debate, but really there is no way a stream of digits can beat the real vinyl experience. Read more...
When I was his age, that was me!
Ask anyone with a real and passionate interest in audio - they got into it young. But as young as this? That's going some! Read more...
One hundred ways to record the snare drum
Are there a hundred different ways to record the snare drum? The answer is 'Yes!', and you need to understand them all... Read more...
Spend $3600 on a microphone, then find that your recordings are no better than before
Having great equipment doesn't always lead to great recordings. And how much will you regret wasting your money? Read more...
Punk Production - adding excitement to professionalism
With many home recording enthusiasts setting their sights on making their productions sound professional, somehow *excitement* seems to be taking a back seat. Wouldn't it be great if your recordings could be both professional AND exciting? Read more...
Cor blimey! George Martin is a Cockney! Would you Adam and Eve it?
George Martin, producer of The Beatles, is posher than the Queen of England. So who would have thought he was once a Cockney? Read more...
Q: How can I work on my voice?
It's a simple question, but the answer is both simple and complex at the same time. Read more...
"Day After Day (Xenochron)" by Pink Jimi Photon
This one was written back when I was 21 or so and has been recorded a few times on various media. In this case, the bed tracks were recorded on a friend's mac laptop using i presume garageband in 2003 I think.... Read more...
A fascinating and inexpensive multiple loop recorder for your iDevice
If you have an iDevice and $4.99 to spare, you can take a weird trip with an extraordinary looping app, the TC-Helicon VoiceJam. Read more...
What will happen to your computer when you die?
When you're dead, you're dead. What a fantastic opportunity for people to start rifling though your life! Read more...