It is common practice among sound and recording engineers to choose microphones according to the instrument to be amplified or recorded. Sometimes you will see published guidelines, especially in the catalogs of microphone manufacturers, but microphones are best chosen by experimentation and experience. Try it and see, in other words.
But there are some classic mics for very particular applications. One example is the AKG D112, which is known everywhere as a kick drum mic.
Now this is specialization on steroids - a mic that you would use for no other purpose than kick drum? Well, you can use it for all kinds of sound sources, but the kick drum is where this mic has made its name, and it does the job very well.
So why is this mic so suitable for kick drum recording and amplification?
Firstly its heritage. The AKG D112 is a development of the venerable D12, which was found by trial and error during its heyday to be a very good kick drum mic, probably by accident more than intention. The D112 brings the D12 up to date in terms of manufacturing quality and design, and retains the D12's characteristic sound.
Secondly, the AKG D112 is a microphone that can handle a high sound pressure level, which is exactly what you get from a kick drum. Levels as high as 160 dB SPL are handled with ease, according to AKG, and there is no specified upper maximum level - probably the level was outside of the range of AKG's test equipment, and since any human being would be deafened instantly at this level, I think 'adequate' is the appropriate word here.
The AKG D112 is a dynamic microphone, so there is no internal amplifier to overload, and of course it does not require powering. The odd shape is due to the large diaphragm. It is a fallacy that low frequency sounds are picked up better by a larger diaphragm. On the other hand, you wouldn't expect this mic to handle very high frequencies particularly well, but that is not its purpose.

One puzzle is how to tell the front of this mic. Since the AKG D112 is nominally cardioid in sensitivity, it is more sensitive in one direction than the other. To be honest, judging from the polar diagram, it isn't all that cardioid, which leads to an interesting point that I shall reveal shortly.
Conventionally, you can tell which is the front of a microphone (if in doubt) by the manufacturer's logo. The side with the logo is the front. However, this mic has 'AKG' on one side and 'D112' on the other. Actually, the mesh grille side is the front, so this microphone defies conventional practice.
During testing however, since I wasn't sure which was the front of the mic, I tried it both ways round, and you can hear the results.
I placed the microphone about 5 cm outside of a Pearl kick drum that had a large hole cut in the front head. There was a moderate amount of damping material inside.
Here is the sound of the D112 with the front (mesh grille side) pointing towards the drum: ![]()
As you can hear, it is a full-bodied sound with a good subjective 'quantity' of bass - the subjective quantity of bass doesn't always correlate with frequency and level. I don't find anything lacking in this sound; in the context of the rest of the kit and with a little EQ perhaps it will work fine.
I don't know whether it would make me buy the mic though. Here is a much less expensive Shure SM57 in comparison: ![]()
There's not a lot to choose here, so I guess I would go for the cheaper mic.
However, when I placed the AKG D112 pointing directly away from the drum (as I said, I wasn't sure which side was the front), I got something I didn't expect. The level was lower, but the sound quality was something else entirely: ![]()
Now this is what I call a kick drum sound - not only can you hear the bass, you can hear the impact of the beater, and almost feel the rush of air coming from the drum. This is an excellent kick drum sound with all the elements well in place - anything you don't want can be EQ'd out. Perhaps there is some element of reflection involved, but nevertheless this is excellent sonic material to work with.
To my mind, this sound possibility fully justifies the price of the AKG D112. Plainly, orientating the mic in the reverse direction is going to lead to some unwanted pickup, which might be significant for live use, but for recording I doubt whether you could find anything better.
So, I have placed my order for the AKG D112 and it's going to be a permanent feature in front of my kick drum. The AKG D112 kick drum microphone is highly recommended.
Learn more about the AKG D112 kick drum microphone...
“It isn't about equipment and software -
An RP reader sets us a challenge to answer his question in utter seriousness without any trace of inappropriate humor... Read more...
The money in music is divided like this - the top 1% get nearly all of it! But soon it might be possible for the 'middle-class' musician to make a decent living. Read more...
All live sound mixing consoles have pan controls. But there are very good reasons not to use them. Not if you respect your audience, that is. Read more...
Every microphone used in pro audio has a diaphragm. Suppose that a new technology could detect sound in a non-invasive way. Surely that would be much more accurate than the mics we now have? Read more...
A interesting question asked by an Audio Masterclass student. Well does it?? Read more...
A RecordProducer.com reader just happens to have a mixer standing around doing nothing. But he could use it as a preamp, couldn't he? Read more...
It's a simple question, but the answer is both simple and complex at the same time. Read more...
So you record using virtual instruments. Can you really call yourself a producer? Read more...
It was supposed to be a magical and revolutionary device. But now that it's here, it is plain that it really isn't anything special at all. Read more...
This is an Expert Village video about how to put together a home recording studio with various pieces of equipment, specifically the microphone. The speaker talks about various types of microphones or how to set it up and related pieces of equipment. Read more...
An RP reader has a turntable and a mixing console. But they are not sounding good together... Read more...
It's a rare bass guitar recording that doesn't vary in level to some extent. In most cases, this adds nothing to the musicality of the recording and just makes the track harder to mix. Read more...
An RP reader has a question about phase. But normally it's best to learn what something is before you decide to get rid of it. Read more...
A 26 year old song has been banned from Canadian radio. Canadians are now protected from hearing an offensive word (three times in the same verse!) Read more...
Take off the grille cloth of your loudspeakers and you will see that they have holes, with tubes extending inside the cabinet. Why? What would happen if you blocked them up? Read more...
A Record-Producer.com visitor asks whether a good analog-to-digital converter is necessary. Or will any old converter do? Read more...
Lower latency, better CPU load balancing, reduced memory usage, better disk performance... Something to look forward to? Read more...
If this is an electric guitar, then it's an odd one. But perhaps it isn't a guitar at all... Read more...
As Roger Waters of Pink Floyd once said, "It doesn't have to be loud. We just like it loud." Well, some people would like it even louder. Is this possible? Read more...
One of the potential problems of compression is pumping. And in this example it's about as bad as it gets. Read more...
An RP reader finds that a certain combination of microphone and preamp works much better than he expected...
Anyone with a home recording studio now has the means to create a hit. So why haven't you yet?
What sounds good to the electric guitar player doesn't necessarily sound good to the audience. A live sound engineer explains...
So you're setting yourself up in the voice over business. What should you think about before anything else?
Amazingly, the answer to this question is - almost - yes!
If you're miking one of the finest violinists in the world, should you point the mic at the double bass instead?
An RP reader fears losing cabinet resonances if the backline of his band is miked up through the PA. But perhaps it is innovation in live sound that has been lost over the years.
Any theatre would have tielines from the stage to the sound control booth. But from one side of the booth's window to the other?
A major producer has 'stolen' a song from a pair of unknowns. A crime, or normal everyday life in the music business?
AKG makes some of the best mics in the world. AKG also makes a USB mic. A great USB mic?
Two singers, one microphone. Could it cause an Internet sensation?
If a tree falls in the woods, does it make a sound (if no-one is around to hear it?) If you can't hear hum, then is there no hum?
Are you planning on getting your tracks mastered? Then the first rule of preparation is not to master the tracks yourself.
You can get a plug-in to emulate virtually any analog audio process these days. But what about hum? Where's the plug-in for that?
Take a 300-year old bass line, a cello player with just seven days' experience, and some highly uncool-looking musicians... and make a recording that is really top of the pops for weird!
Sometimes unusual microphone placements can capture an interesting sound. In this instance, the sound is completely wrong.
Clicks occur for all kinds of reasons - imprecise editing, random noises, gremlin infestation. But when do you need to do something about them?
There are so many decisions to be made during the process of recording. Should you make them one at a time as you go along, or let them pile up so that you have a mass of decisions to make in the mix?
Audio production - it's all about the DAW isn't it? Well that's what marketers would have you believe.
Content can be art. Art can be content. But when content is just a commodity, there is surely something going wrong.
Earlier discussion on this topic...
Jim S. Band
Thanks for the article. Obvoiusly, the D112 has the same design flaws as the old D12 - which I didn't like either.
I even like the good ol' SM58 or 57 better for kick.
Friday July 21, 2006
Gigi
The front is always where the logo is
Thursday July 13, 2006
EVL
I think you´ve just sold me the D112... I gotta get one.
Tuesday May 23, 2006
Dominic, NYC, US
That is a pretty incredible sound difference, I can't wait to try it. But I am wondering, if you point it away from the bass drum, won't you be picking up a lot more bleeding from the rest of the kit? Or is the bleeding still not loud enough to really kill the effect? Also, how does it react when you place the bass drum in a "tent" of sorts?
anyway, nice article!
Wednesday May 03, 2006
microsound
Im using d112 also for leslie and it sounds great
verry clean and punchy signal in f.o.h. alowes me to have a flat on mix eq.For double kikck drummers Im using kombination on main pedal d112 and secondary shure b 52 couse secondary kick is usualy not so powerful than main.
Friday July 08, 2005
JCC
other ways of using it is double mic
use D112 inside the kick
and plus one more Sm57 outside the kick (point to the front or back depends on what sound u want)
the combination of inside and outside can get much more details of a kick and also give people more options of how to mix it.
or 1 great Condensor mic(C-4000)AKG
put it in front of kick (this mic can stand high up to 140 spl plus great for low frequency, but...don't put it inside the kick...too sensivity for it!
Thursday July 07, 2005
Alex
Very cool!, I gave it a try and WOW!.
I've used the D12 for a while and pretty much like the sound. I read this and used the d112, it was good but for the price?. If your interested, you should try the very cheap Apex125. I've had some great sounds ( no EQ ) for under $100 CND.
Just throwing in my 2 cents.
Great article... works great
Alex
Tuesday July 05, 2005