According to an article in the Daily Mail and elsewhere, The Beatles' original audition tape for Decca Records, made in 1962, has been rediscovered after having lain dormant among a collection of memorabilia.
Clearly this recording of ten songs will be of significant interest to Beatles fans, and to whoever is willing to pay possibly £30,000 or more at auction.
But I have to ask the question whether this tape is genuine. It may be a complete fake, or it may be a copy of the original tape.
The reason I wonder is that the spool and box pictured are most definitely not of 1962 vintage. I am absolutely certain that this style of spool was not introduced by Ampex until at least the mid 1970s. A more dedicated enthusiast of recording history may be able to date it more precisely. I further wonder whether Decca would have used a US brand of tape when UK-manufactured tape was available and import duties were high.
I even question the writing in what seems to be felt-tip pen, the modern version of which was only introduced in 1962 and was not in common use until later in the 1960s.

Then there is the discrepancy between the outside of the box that states 'stereo 1/2 tk' and the label inside that states '2 track mono'. Decca engineers would not have allowed any confusion to arise over whether the recording was mono or stereo. If the recording was made in stereo (which it could have been in 1962) then it would indeed be stereo half-track. '2 track mono' could make sense as it might refer to a mono recording made on a stereo machine with identical signals going to both tracks. Playback would be a little less noisy on a similar machine rather than on a full-track mono machine that would also pick up noise from the guard band between the tracks.
Of course, it may be that the tape itself is the original, wound onto a different spool and placed in a different box. And even if it is a copy of decent quality then it will certainly make interesting listening.
P.S. One more point - The Dolby noise reduction system was not available until 1965, and the Dolby tone (as mentioned on the inside label) introduced even later!
Note on copyright: As a news item specifically about the appearance of this item, fair use is claimed in respect of the photographs.
“It isn't about equipment and software -
The pinna of the ear helps to collect sound, obviously. But why does it have those complicated folds? And why do we only have two ears and not three? Read more...
Everyone knows that you should compress the snare and kick drum. But why should you do it, and how should you do it? Read more...
Everyone would like an 1176 or LA-2A compressor in their studio. But the originals cost so much that plug-in emulations are usually the only viable alternative. But do they sound the same? Read more...
The compressor is a great studio tool. But does it work for live sound? Is there a hidden danger that will keep the engineer on his toes? Read more...
One microphone, one fader... How difficult can it be? Read more...
Sometimes unusual microphone placements can capture an interesting sound. In this instance, the sound is completely wrong. Read more...
A RecordProducer.com reader has an expensive microphone preamplifier. But he worries that all is lost when he connects it to the preamp of his audio interface. Read more...
Having great equipment doesn't always lead to great recordings. And how much will you regret wasting your money? Read more...
The problem with musicians is that they won't stay still. Or they sniff. Or rattle their dentures. When should the producer step in and tell them to stop? Read more...
When I do live sound, it's always a lot louder at the front of the auditorium than at the back. How can I get the sound all the way to the back of the room? Read more...
You can get a plug-in to emulate virtually any analog audio process these days. But what about hum? Where's the plug-in for that? Read more...
A RecordProducer.com reader who is a live sound engineer has a compressor, and he is determined to use it. Is this a good idea? Read more...
An RP reader asks, "In a crowded place, when we play an audio CD through the PA system, most of the time it sounds great because the audio is probably highly compressed. But when we play live music with our band through the same PA system, it sounds dull, no matter how much we equalize. My question is: Is it possible to find a compressor that will allow us to obtain the same punch in a live concert situation?" Read more...
If you look at the photo carefully, you will see that this Studer A80 analog tape recorder has several more tape guides than the norm. It's used for mastering. But why? Read more...
An RP reader asks an impossible question. After all, equalizers don't have a threshold control. Or do they? Read more...
An Audio Masterclass student asks, "I would like to try using a summing mixer. I have a 16 channel Tascam analog desk (very old). Would this be suitable? It is 16-8-4-2. How is that?" Read more...
Have you got what it takes to make it in the music business? Maybe you have. But so have a million other people. Read more...
If your music is neither beautiful nor exciting, then it is unlikely to find an audience. We hear many recordings at Audio Masterclass that are professional. But mere professionalism isn't enough to get you noticed. A professional-sounding recording can be useful as an album filler, and even in the age of the download there are album-fillers aplenty being bashed out in pro studios. But to make an impact and achieve true success, your work needs to be beautiful. And if it isn't beautiful, then it needs to be exciting! Read more...
Have you ever wondered why there is a silvery patch inside a vacuum tube? Is it there for a purpose? Does it affect the sound of the tube? Read more...
Classical music just needs to be recorded, doesn't it? Well in some cases it really can be produced.
Can an $89 pair of monitors really be an effective tool in the recording studio? Or are they only good for 'media creation?
A wrong note that has resonated for more than half a century is fixed - without the aid of a time machine.
An RP reader finds that a certain combination of microphone and preamp works much better than he expected...
Anyone with a home recording studio now has the means to create a hit. So why haven't you yet?
What sounds good to the electric guitar player doesn't necessarily sound good to the audience. A live sound engineer explains...
So you're setting yourself up in the voice over business. What should you think about before anything else?
Amazingly, the answer to this question is - almost - yes!
If you're miking one of the finest violinists in the world, should you point the mic at the double bass instead?
An RP reader fears losing cabinet resonances if the backline of his band is miked up through the PA. But perhaps it is innovation in live sound that has been lost over the years.
Any theatre would have tielines from the stage to the sound control booth. But from one side of the booth's window to the other?
A major producer has 'stolen' a song from a pair of unknowns. A crime, or normal everyday life in the music business?
AKG makes some of the best mics in the world. AKG also makes a USB mic. A great USB mic?
Two singers, one microphone. Could it cause an Internet sensation?
If a tree falls in the woods, does it make a sound (if no-one is around to hear it?) If you can't hear hum, then is there no hum?
Are you planning on getting your tracks mastered? Then the first rule of preparation is not to master the tracks yourself.
You can get a plug-in to emulate virtually any analog audio process these days. But what about hum? Where's the plug-in for that?
Take a 300-year old bass line, a cello player with just seven days' experience, and some highly uncool-looking musicians... and make a recording that is really top of the pops for weird!
Sometimes unusual microphone placements can capture an interesting sound. In this instance, the sound is completely wrong.
Clicks occur for all kinds of reasons - imprecise editing, random noises, gremlin infestation. But when do you need to do something about them?
Earlier discussion on this topic...
Arthur, Baltimore, USA
What a joke?? The real story behind the Original Decca tape, is that Joe Pope, who had a Beatles Fan Club.."Strawberry Fields Forever",bought the original from Allen Carr.Joe Pope issued Boot colored vinyl 45's,two tracks at a time,for his club members.All were on 45's except "Take Good Care Of My Baby",which was put on the Boot LP'The Decca Tapes" if you have that one, it's good, being that the tape used for that, is one away from Joe Pope's master.Don't know where this fake tape their pushing, comes from.But it IS a fake..
Monday November 26, 2012
Ron Macpherson, Boston, Ma
It's a fake! The bootleggers record number is on the tape box BSR-1111. The "BSR" is for Backstage Records which put out an abridged bootleg sometime in 1982 or 1983, long after the songs were first distributed in the late 70's. This tape is at best 4th generation removed from the Decca original. The original Decca master is either lost, destroyed or missing in their vaults. Brian's Epstein's tape copy was the source of the boots in the 70's. Apple/EMI used THAT source on Anthology 1. REM
Saturday November 24, 2012
Larry, Fort Collins, Co, USA
Terribly unprofessional for someone to have written "Sivler Beatles" on the box . . .
Friday November 23, 2012
Norwood, Ny, USA
Guy's that's the tape for the 'Dawn of the Silver Beatles' album that came out in 1980.
Friday November 23, 2012
Robert Golden, Bakersfield CA, USA
It doesn't seem right to me. I wouldn't want to be the person that buys it.
Friday November 23, 2012
Phil Norris, Stroud, England
I agree, the 'Copy' is probably a fake, that it should surface over 50 years after it was recorded in what looks like a very new condition is very suspect. Also on my cd of the 'Decca Tapes' there are 15 tracks, only 10 seem to be listed here? I would'nt pay more than 30p for this tape, let alone
£30, 000!!
Beatles Fan - Phil Norris
Friday November 23, 2012