Q: How thick should acoustic treatment be?

David Mellor

David Mellor is CEO and Course Director of Audio Masterclass. David has designed courses in audio education and training since 1986 and is the publisher and principal writer of Record-Producer.com.

Tuesday June 15, 2010

Q: "I want to line the walls of my studio with absorbent materials. How thick should the absorbers be?"

If your recording room is too reverberant, then this reverberation will get onto your recordings. Reverberation can be added to a dry recording, but it can never be removed.

If your control room is too reverberant, then the sound that is bouncing around will color your judgment and you won't be able to monitor and mix accurately.

The solution in both cases is to apply acoustic treatment.

There are two common types of acoustic treatment. One is the porous absorber, the other is the panel absorber, also known as the membrane absorber.

Any material that is soft and full of air-pockets will function as a porous absorber. Examples include curtains (drapes), carpet, glass fiber loft insulation and mineral wool. Of these, mineral wool is normally preferred for its effectiveness and low cost.

Mineral wool is often supplied in slabs that are around 50 mm deep.

You will find that a surface covered with such slabs will absorb high frequencies almost completely. However it will not absorb low frequencies at all.

This has to do with the wavelength of audible sounds.

The wavelength of the highest frequency that is normally considered to be in the audible range, 20 kHz or 20,000 Hz, is around 17 mm.

However the wavelength of the lowest frequency that is normally considered to be in the audible range, 20 Hz, is 17 meters!

Clearly, absorption that is a mere 5 centimeters deep will have hardly any effect on a sound wave that is measured in meters.

As a rule of thumb, a porous absorber is effective for a wavelength that is four times its thickness, and all shorter wavelengths

So mineral wool that is 5 cm thick will absorb frequencies of 1700 Hz and above. Below 1700 Hz, it will be less and less effective.

In practical terms, it is effective to use porous absorption up to around 10 cm thick. For frequencies below that, panel absorbers are easier to find space for because they don't have to be so thick. We will discuss panel absorbers on another occasion.

Bear in mind that if you use only porous absorption, your room will become bass-heavy because of the low frequencies that are still bouncing around.

By the way, the photo shows an anechoic chamber where virtually all reverberation is absorbed.

Like, follow, and comment on this article at Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, Instagram or the social network of your choice.

Come on the Audio Masterclass Pro Home Studio MiniCourse - 60 great hints and tips to get your home recording studio MOVING

It's FREE!

Get It Now >>

An interesting microphone setup for violinist Nigel Kennedy

Are you compressing too much? Here's how to tell...

If setting the gain correctly is so important, why don't mic preamplifiers have meters?

The Internet goes analogue!

How to choose an audio interface

Audio left-right test. Does it matter?

Electric guitar - compress before the amp, or after?

What is comb filtering? What does it sound like?

NEW: Audio crossfades come to Final Cut Pro X 10.4.9!

What is the difference between EQ and filters? *With Audio*

What difference will a preamp make to your recording?

Watch our video on linear phase filters and frequency response with the FabFilter Pro Q 2

Read our post on linear phase filters and frequency response with the Fabfilter Pro Q 2

Harmonic distortion with the Soundtoys Decapitator

What's the best height for studio monitors? Answer - Not too low!

What is the Red Book standard? Do I need to use it? Why?

Will floating point change the way we record?

Mixing: What is the 'Pedalboard Exception'?

The difference between mic level and line level

The problem with parallel compression that you didn't know you had. What it sounds like and how to fix it.

Compressing a snare drum to even out the level

What does parallel compression on vocals sound like?

How to automate tracks that have parallel compression

Why mono is better than stereo for recording vocals and dialogue